Legal Opinion

United States v. Kevin Dennis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 18, 2013No. 13-3137UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

Kevin Dennis appeals his conviction based on a guilty plea. Specifically, he alleges that the district court committed several violations of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 that amount to plain error and deprived him of a knowing and voluntary plea. Dennis also appeals the procedural reasonableness of his sentence. We AFFIRM Dennis’s conviction for the reasons below, but REMAND for resen-tencing in light of intervening precedent.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2006, Kevin Dennis entered into an agreement to plead guilty to four counts of a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Walker v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API