Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Tatlock

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Agpeal from Louisa District Court. — Hon. D. Ryan, Judge. Action for damages for a breach of a covenant against incumbrance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. Plaintiff avers: That on November 3, 1883, he purchased certain land of defendants and paid for the same. That they executed and delivered to him their warranty deed therefor, which contained the following provision: “ And we warrant the title hereto against all persons whomsoever.” That at the time he 1 purchased the land it was mortgaged, which fact was known to defendants, but not known to plaintiff, and was concealed from plaintiff. That he has been compelled to pay said mortgage in the sum of five hundred and sixty dollars, and has been damaged in the sum of four hundred dollars for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Funk v. CreswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  2. Specht v. SpangenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Flynn v. White Breast Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. McGowen v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Royer v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Joiner v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Killilea v. DouglasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Schurger v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McClure v. DeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API