Legal Opinion
Strippoli v. Bickal
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Easton, J.
This is a proceeding for an injunction brought on by a petition and show cause order. The petitioners are parents of children attending School No. 30 of the City of Rochester, Monroe County, New York, and also representing School No. 30 District Association which is an organization of many parents similarly situated. This matter was referred to me by Special Term, to hear and determine after which an extensive hearing was held.
Because of the failure to serve or present a summons and complaint the proceeding does not constitute an action for declaratory judgment nor is it a taxpayers’ action…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Engel v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brewer v. West Irondequoit Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Di Sano v. StorandtNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Mercado v. ScribnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Katalinic v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Laurie A. Brewer, and Jodie Foster, Individually and as Parents and Guardians of Jessica L. Haak, a Minor v. The West Irondequoit Central School District, the Urban-Suburban Interdistrict Transfer Program, Monroe Number One Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Theresa J. Woodson, Gretchen Stephan and Marlene S. Allen, in Their Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.