Legal Opinion

Di Sano v. Storandt

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles B. Brasser, J.

Upon the petition of petitioners-plaintiffs, an order was granted by this court directing respondents-defendants to show cause why an order should not be made enjoining and restraining the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Schools of the City of Rochester “ from using public monies and moneys raised by public taxation * * * in connection with the operation of the so-called Open Enrollment Plan, ’ ’ and in transferring students from one public school to another in the City of Rochester for the purpose of correcting so-called racial imbalance.

Petitioners-plaintiffs, hereafter named…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Rachel Lynn Bell, a Minor, by Mrs. Odessa K. Bell, Her Mother, Etc. v. School City of Gary, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Briggs v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1955
  4. Bell v. School City of Gary, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1963
  5. Brown v. Board of Education of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Katalinic v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API