Legal Opinion

Edinburg v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 19, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the last of the appeals in the Edinburg litigation. The judge allowed the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56(a), 365 Mass. 824 (1974). A judgment was entered declaring that the three plaintiffs had been lawfully designated as the primary beneficiaries on two policies of life insurance issued by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company on the life of their father, Joseph M. Edinburg. The defendant Dorothy B. Edinburg, the plaintiffs’ mother and Joseph’s wife, has appealed.3 We affirm the judgment.

*9241. The defendant Dorothy B. Edinburg argues that she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. United States Trust Co. of New York v. HerriottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. A. John Cohen Ins. Agency v. Middlesex Ins. Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Slaven v. City of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Resnek v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Management & Research Co. v. OstranderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Hodge v. KlugMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Hodge v. KlugMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Hunt v. RiceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Hunt v. RiceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API