Legal Opinion

Pidkameny v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 1990No. 89-2073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for trafficking in cocaine over twenty-eight grams. Appellant initially asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. Next, he says that the trial court erred in refusing a requested instruction on entrapment. Finally, he says that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss on the grounds that the informant was paid a contingency fee based on the amount of drugs obtained. Because we find appellant’s arguments to be without merit, we affirm.

David Butler, who was on probation and addicted to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GlossonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Herrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Ramos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SargentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. SargentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Feldt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API