Copeland v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddiN, Associate Justice.
Appellant was convicted of keeping a gambling bouse in violation of § 41-2001, Ark. Stats. His motion for new trial contains thirteen assignments wbicb be has grouped and argues under the four topics now to be discussed.
I. Motion For Directed Verdict. This necessitates a review of some of the evidence. The Sheriff of St. Francis County obtained a warrant to search a gambling bonse ¡known as “The Groves”; and executed the warrant one night about ten o’clock. Appellant, Copeland, opened the door when informed of the warrant. Approximately seventeen persons…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Tiner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Pool v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978