Legal Opinion

Froiland v. Tritle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1992No. 17659PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

James Tritle appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Diane Froi-land, the executrix of Richard Froiland’s estate. We affirm.

FACTS

James Tritle (Tritle) is a dentist from Brookings, South Dakota, who practiced for roughly forty years. In anticipation of retirement, he sold his practice to a young dentist, Richard Froiland (Froiland), pursuant to a purchase agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) dated October 4, 1985. In the Agreement, Tritle agreed to transfer all of the accounts receivable, assets, fixtures and furnishings, leasehold improvements, patient records,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Peterson v. Safway Steel Scaffolds Co. of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Rittler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Bean v. HazelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Estate of Bean v. HazelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API