Legal Opinion

United States v. Hood

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 13, 1957No. 9986PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was charged with six offenses. Three specifications were laid under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, and each alleges the theft of a letter from the mails on a different date. Each of the other three specifications charges the larceny of a postal money - order, and all were laid under Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. The addressee of the letter set out in the numbered specifications under Article 134 is named as the owner of the money order in a correspondingly numbered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. ModesettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. RosenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. LentonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. FuenteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. RichardsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API