Legal Opinion

United States v. Lenton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 14, 1958No. 9830PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

Brought to trial on one specification of larceny and two specifications alleging conduct in violation of Article 134, the accused entered a plea of guilty. He was represented by individual military counsel who was not a lawyer and the appointed defense counsel. On the basis of his plea, the court-martial returned findings of guilty on all charges. During the sentence procedure individual defense counsel made a statement “in extenuation” for the accused. It is now contended that the matter set out in the statement is inconsistent with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Joyanna Holitogs, Inc. v. I. Hyman Corp. (In Re Joyanna Holitogs, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. United States v. HintonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. KitchenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. WalterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. WallaceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  3. United States v. MargelonyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. SwansonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API