United States v. Lenton
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
Brought to trial on one specification of larceny and two specifications alleging conduct in violation of Article 134, the accused entered a plea of guilty. He was represented by individual military counsel who was not a lawyer and the appointed defense counsel. On the basis of his plea, the court-martial returned findings of guilty on all charges. During the sentence procedure individual defense counsel made a statement “in extenuation” for the accused. It is now contended that the matter set out in the statement is inconsistent with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Joyanna Holitogs, Inc. v. I. Hyman Corp. (In Re Joyanna Holitogs, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- United States v. HintonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. KitchenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. WalterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. WallaceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. MargelonyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. SwansonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.