Legal Opinion

Howell v. Weisemiller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 15, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The construction of an unartful deed in respect to the character of title conveyed and, provisionally, in respect to a restraint on alienation, is presented.

By a deed, dated March 31, 1934, for the consideration of $1,030, F. H. Howell conveyed a certain lot in an addition to Eliza-bethtown to “Bessie Frazier, party of the second part, and Jesse Howell and Richard Thomas Howell, parties of the third part.” Following the reservation of a life estate-in the grantor, the deed continues, “and at his death the right of use and occupancy-of said property to the party of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  2. Sherman v. Petroleum ExplorationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Combs v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Howard v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Lewis Logan v. Ralph Jeffrey CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API