Howell v. Weisemiller
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
The construction of an unartful deed in respect to the character of title conveyed and, provisionally, in respect to a restraint on alienation, is presented.
By a deed, dated March 31, 1934, for the consideration of $1,030, F. H. Howell conveyed a certain lot in an addition to Eliza-bethtown to “Bessie Frazier, party of the second part, and Jesse Howell and Richard Thomas Howell, parties of the third part.” Following the reservation of a life estate-in the grantor, the deed continues, “and at his death the right of use and occupancy-of said property to the party of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Sherman v. Petroleum ExplorationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Combs v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Howard v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Lewis Logan v. Ralph Jeffrey CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023