Hurst's Case
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 387 (____)
4 Dall. 387
Hurst's Case.
Supreme Court of United States.
WASHINGTON, Justice.
I will not examine the powers of the Supreme Court of the state, upon the present occasion. It is enough to assertain, that the power of this Court is competent to the object proposed. If, indeed, any injury would be done either to the plaintiff in the suit, or to the sheriff (both of whom have acted innocently, and without knowledge of the facts, on which the claim of privilege arises) by our interposition, we might be induced to pause upon the subject. But, as to the plaintiff, it is clear, that he…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
- Bridges v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- In re HealeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Christian v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Thompson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.