Legal Opinion
Winstead v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 3, 2009No. Civ. A. 04-887 (JMF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me for all purposes including trial. Currently pending before me is Plaintiffs [sic] (George Morgan, Juanita Irving, James Winstead, Louis Beale, Patricia Newby, Sheila Owens and Mary Waley) Motion for Motion for [sic] Reconsideration of the January 26, 2009 Order (“Plains. Mot.”) [#81]. For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be granted.
As noted in previous opinions, plaintiffs are eleven current or former District of Columbia employees and the estates of two former District of Columbia…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matthews v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Winstead v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Matthews v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Windstead v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010