Legal Opinion

Grana v. Summerford

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Defendant contends that as a matter of law Grana was negligent with respect to turning left. It is said that the Summerford car must have been in Grana’s range of vision; that he either did not look for an approaching car, or turned across the east half of the highway when Summerford’s approach made it unsafe to do sa.

This case was before this court on a prior appeal. On the first trial the jury found Grana negligent as to lookout, but not negligent as to turning left. The trial court granted a new trial on the ground that these answers were inconsistent. We affirmed on that ground, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grana v. SummerfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Seefluth v. Herman Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nieman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Behling v. LohmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API