Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armstrong v. County of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1981Published

1Dissent

Callahan, J. (dissenting in part).

I must dissent in part. I agree that the trial court’s finding of abandonment is not supported in the record. Plaintiffs, Hamilton Armstrong, Jr., and Bonnie B. Armstrong, acquired certain property in 1958 from Hamilton Armstrong, Sr., and Alice Darling Armstrong which was part of an ancestoral tract dating back to a Revolutionary War grant. Plaintiffs’ great aunt, Elizabeth Armstrong, had owned approximately 300 acres situate in the Town of Manlius, Onondaga County, portions of which were previously conveyed to two nephews, Collin Armstrong and Hamilton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Armstrong v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. In re the Schenectady Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Matter of Schenectady Railway Company v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API