Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Rossoe Manufacturing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1960No. 35190PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal, entered after the plaintiff had rested, which raises an issue as to the conditions under which a disfavored driver may be entitled to recover in an intersection collision case.

The disfavored driver entered a north-south arterial from the west, intending to cross the southbound traffic lanes, make a left turn and go north on the arterial. It must be assumed, for present purposes, that though the disfavored driver had not completed her left turn, she had crossed the southbound traffic lanes and was in the northbound lanes; and that, if the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Adkisson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Zorich v. BillingsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Nelson v. MolinaWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golub v. MantopoliWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Novis v. TiptonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Froemming v. Spokane City LinesWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Arendt Speser v. Kelsey And John Doe MondauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Robin Stanley v. Sierra Pacific Land & TimberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API