C.H. v. State of Indiana

OPINION

PYLE, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

C.H. appeals his two adjudications as a delinquent child for having committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute criminal trespass as a Class A mis demeanor, 1 and unlawful entry of a motor vehicle as a Class B misdemeanor. 2 First, C.H. argues that the juvenile court should have excluded an officer’s identification testimony from evidence pursuant to the fruit, of the poisonous tree doctrine of the exclusionary rule. Additionally, C.H. argues that his two adjudications violated the actual evidence test of Indiana’s Double Jeopardy…