Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Belle Fourche Irrigation District
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 8, 1994No. Civ. 93-5068Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 56
BATTEY, District Judge.
NATURE AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff filed this action on June 22, 1993. In his amended complaint (Docket #32) plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to relief pursuant to the first, fourth, and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution and sections 1983 and 1985 of Title 42, United States Code. Further, plaintiff alleges that defendants’ failure to provide him with irrigation water deprived him of constitutionally protected property right in violation of his substantive due…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.