Legal Opinion

West v. Cajun's Wharf, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1988No. 64439Published

1Opinion of the Court

770 P.2d 558 (1988)

James WEST, Appellant,

v.

CAJUN'S WHARF, INC., Appellee.

No. 64439.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 19, 1988.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1989.

Rob L. Pyron, Seminole, for appellant.

Ronald R. Hudson and Charles F. Alden, III, Holloway, Dobson, Hudson & Bachman, Oklahoma City, for appellee.

SUMMERS, Justice.

Today's case turns on whether a defendant's failure to supplement its response to interrogatories should serve as the basis for granting a petition for new trial on newly discovered evidence upon a showing by plaintiff of significant prejudice to itself by reason of such failure.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Thompson Mahogany Company (Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Lillian Weiss v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Lewis Refrigeration Company, a Corporation v. Sawyer Fruit, Vegetable and Cold Storage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API