Legal Opinion

Haug v. Haug

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 8, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill to Account for Partnership Matters.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jasper County; the Hon. Tbuman E. Ames, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1900.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Bigelow

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee filed her bill in chancery in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, against appellant, to require him to account to her as administratrix of the estate of Martin Haug, deceased, for a claimed copartnership interest of deceased in a mercantile business, carried on and conducted for several years by appellant and deceased as copartners, at Hunt City, under the name of “A. Haug & Son,” and which partnership terminated by the death of Martin Haug, February 18, 1899.

The bill avers that the oratrix is the widow of the deceased,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Claim of Houston v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Letson v. HallAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Youngblood v. BoakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API