Legal Opinion

Mumford v. Canty

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1869PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Joseph Gillespie, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was an action of replevin, brought by appellant, in the City Court of East St. Louis, on the 2áth day of March, 1868, against appellee, to recover two mules, a two-horse wagon, and a set of double harness. After a trial in that court, the cause was removed to the Circuit Court of St. Clair county by appeal, and tried at the October term, 1868, and resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The bill of exceptions shows that it was tried upon the following agreed state of facts and evidence:

“ That John. A. Knight was, on the 1st day of May, 186Y, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McAllister v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Bevans v. BoltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  3. Reed v. EamesIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Phinney v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Funk v. StaatsIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Denny v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Shapard v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Handley v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Studebaker Bros. v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1905

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API