Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Thomsen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 2000No. 9430232; CA A100930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Husband appeals the trial court’s refusal to modify his child support obligation and to terminate his spousal support obligation. We review de novo and affirm.

The parties’ 11-year marriage was dissolved in 1995. The trial court granted wife custody of the parties’ two children. It also awarded wife spousal support in the amount of $200 per month for four years and child support in the amount of $497 per month. Husband appealed the trial court’s decision on those issues, and we affirmed. Thomsen and Thomsen, 145 Or App 484, 930 P2d 902 (1996). During the marriage, husband completed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of GlitheroOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re the Marriage of BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Pedroza v. PedrozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. In re the Marriage of LaFavorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. In re the Marriage of AdcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Marriage of Pierce and PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API