In Re the Marriage of Glithero
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
The issue in this domestic relations case pertains to modification of child support. The trial court denied father’s motion to reduce child support on the ground that father had failed to prove that the hardship to him of continuing the present amount of support outweighed the hardship that would befall the children, were the amount of child support to be reduced. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Glithero and Glithero, 146 Or App 398, 934 P2d 492 (1997). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
We limit our review to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Willis v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In re the Marriage of GlitheroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of NiethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In re the Marriage of DominguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- In re the Marriage of ThomsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- In re the Marriage of CofskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- In re the Marriage of WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.