Legal Opinion
Bailey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 22, 2009No. 1D08-3267PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
LEWIS, J.
We grant the State’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Meigo Bailey, Appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, burglary of a dwelling, and two counts of attempted robbery. He appeals these convictions, arguing that the trial court erred in admitting an audio-recorded statement, which he contends was taken in violation of his right against self-incrimination. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
On December 2, 2004,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Braddy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Robert Pernell McCloud v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Womack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. SepanikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Martha Miles v. City of Edgewater Police DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.