Legal Opinion

Tinnell v. the Louisville Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 13, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

This is a companion case of Jannie Tinnell v. Louisville Railway Co., 250 Ky. 245, 62 S. W. (2d) 467, this day decided.

The suit was brought by the appellant, Tom Tin-nell, her husband, against the same defendants for .damages which he suffered by reason of the loss of his wife’s society and companionship due to her injuries sustained in the manner outlined in that opinion.

Except as to the character of damages claimed, the petition is in all respects the same as that filed by the wife. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tinnell v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Twyman v. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pelfrey v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API