Tinnell v. Louisville Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
A demurrer of the appellee, the Louisville Railway Company, to the petition as amended of the appellant, Jannie Tinnell, against it and R. M. Sanders, was sustained and the plaintiff suffered a dismissal thereof as against the railway company. The substance of the material portions of the petition is that a street car of the defendant company was stopped between street intersections, at a place which was not a regular stop; that the gates were opened and the passengers, of which she was one, were allowed to alight; and that as she did so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louisville Railway Company v. SaxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Louisville Railway Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tinnell v. the Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933