Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Delgado-Nunez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 20, 2002No. 01-50438Published

1DissentDennis, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision finding that Delgado-Nunez waived any claim to improper venue. Moreover, because venue was improper in the Western District of Texas where he was tried, I would reverse and vacate the district court’s decision.

“A defendant’s right to be tried in the district in which the crime took place finds its roots in both the Constitution and federal statutory law.”1 Article III, Section *4992, Clause 3, states that “[t]rial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed.”2 Furthermore, the Sixth Amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Bennie Ray Winship, A/K/A Nip, and Jerry BiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Darrell Eugene LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Harry O. Stratton, William D. Riggs and Loy Z. Harrell, United States of America v. Samuel S. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API