Legal Opinion

United States v. Harry O. Stratton, William D. Riggs and Loy Z. Harrell, United States of America v. Samuel S. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1981No. 78-5586, 78-5589PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

We are faced today with what is both substantively and procedurally a rara avis in the covey of federal cases. A Florida state court judge — a man charged with upholding our nation’s laws — together with his bailiff and two other individuals, has been convicted of converting his office into a nest of bribery and corruption. During the trial of these men, the district judge made several unusual procedural rulings in an effort to keep the entire flock of defendants together in a single proceeding. We find that the indictment in this case was substantively sufficient to…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API