Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 22, 1999No. 98-3466PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.
Michael E. and Lorrie Schultz appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the Juneau County Agricultural Society and its insurer, T.I.G. Insurance Company. Thé Schultzes argue that the trial court erred by applying Wisconsin's recreational immunity statute, § 895.52, Stats., because, at the time he was injured by a runaway steer, Michael Schultz was not engaged in a recreational activity. The Schultzes also argue that even if Schultz was engaged in a recreational activity when he tried to subdue the steer, he acted as a Good Samaritan and we should make a Good Samaritan…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Linville v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Hall v. Turtle Lake Lions ClubCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. Midwest Security InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Kautz Ex Rel. Kautz v. Ozaukee County Agricultural SocietyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Miller Ex Rel. Fehring v. Wausau Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Minnesota Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Paper Recycling of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Minnesota Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Paper Recycling of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.