Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2001No. 99-2987PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 1. This case requires us to determine who qualifies as an "owner" of "property" for purposes of the recreational immunity statute, Wis. Stat. § 895.52 (1997-98), which immunizes property owners against liability for injuries to persons engaged in recreational activity on their property. More specifically, the issue is whether the owner of a tree stand used for deer hunting is entitled to recreational immunity when he does not also own the real property upon which the tree stand is situated.

*570¶ 2. The plaintiff, Danny Peterson, was injured when the tree stand from which he was bow hunting gave…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Sievert v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Waters Ex Rel. Skow v. PertzbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patti J. Roberts v. T.H.E. Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Burg Ex Rel. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. WEA Property & Casualty Insurance v. KrisikCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. Wilmet v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
  5. Fox v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API