Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1953No. 34809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

The pivotal question presented for our consideration is whether the trial court had jurisdiction of the cause of action upon which plaintiffs sought to recover a money judgment against the defendant.

Charles B. Barry and Elizabeth Barry, husband and wife, were plaintiffs below and John E. Smith was defendant below, and they will be referred to in the same position as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendant was engaged in the business of building and selling houses in the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma. On September 13, 1947, defendant entered into a contract with plaintiffs to sell them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. FlaglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Newsom v. MedisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Marathon Oil Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slater v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Bolding v. ClantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API