Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. McConnell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Broadly speaking the bill seeks a recovery against McConnell, Superintendent of Banks, and the surety on his official bond, for nonfeasance in office alleged to have resulted in pecuniary loss to complainants.

The bill was seasonably demurred to, but the case was not set for hearing by complainants at the first term subsequent to that at which the demurrers were interposed.

A motion was filed by defendants to dismiss the suit because the demurrer was not set for hearing at the first term.

Pending the hearing of said motion, the complainants made a motion to be permitted to dismiss their bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Mix v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. McGee v. Fourth & First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Marley v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. LobbanTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Harrison v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Shelton v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API