Legal Opinion

Saltzstein v. Nahmens

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: WarreN D. TarraNt, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 28, 1913:

2Per curiam

In December, 1911, this action of garnishment was commenced in the civil court of Milwaukee county by the issuance of a summons in garnishment in aid of an execution. Judgment against the garnishees having been rendered in that court, Nahmens, the execution debtor, attempted to appeal to the circuit court, but did not serve his notice of appeal on the judge of the civil court who tried the case. Both parties appeared generally in the circuit court and, on motion of the respondent, the judgment of the civil court was affirmed, whereupon Nahmens…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manufacturers & Merchants Inspection Bureau v. Everwear Hosiery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kidder v. FayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fred Miller Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Polluck v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. RoachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Breckheimer v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API