Legal Opinion

Polo Building Group, Inc. v. Rakita (In Re Shubov)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 2000No. BAP No. NC-99-1531-KPRy, Bankruptcy No. 95-3-2611-TCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

253 B.R. 540 (2000)

In re Vladimir SHUBOV, Debtor.

Polo Building Group, Inc.; Arlo Hale Smith, Appellants,

v.

Faina Rakita, Appellee.

BAP No. NC-99-1531-KPRy, Bankruptcy No. 95-3-2611-TC.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 2000.

Decided September 27, 2000.

Arlo Hale Smith, San Francisco, CA, for Polo Building Group, Inc.

Before: KLEIN, PERRIS, and RYAN, Bankruptcy Judges.

OPINION

KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Appellants abused the power to issue federal civil subpoenas and were sanctioned under two rules ill-suited to the situation. We AFFIRM on the basis of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Barber v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API