Ex Parte Bertram
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I dissent from the majority's holding that the judgment in this case must be reversed and the case remanded. I disagree with the majority's reasoning that the "traditional rules of statutory construction" interpreting § 32-5A-191, Ala. Code 1975, prevent the use of an out-of-state conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance in determining the appropriate sentence for a conviction pursuant to § 32-5A-191(f), (g), or (h).
As the Court of Criminal Appeals has stated:
"`Although criminal statutes must be strictly construed in favor of those sought to be subject…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Nobis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Donley v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.