Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Bertram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 2003No. 1010892Published

1Dissent

I dissent from the majority's holding that the judgment in this case must be reversed and the case remanded. I disagree with the majority's reasoning that the "traditional rules of statutory construction" interpreting § 32-5A-191, Ala. Code 1975, prevent the use of an out-of-state conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance in determining the appropriate sentence for a conviction pursuant to § 32-5A-191(f), (g), or (h).

As the Court of Criminal Appeals has stated:

"`Although criminal statutes must be strictly construed in favor of those sought to be subject…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Nobis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Mayberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Donley v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API