Legal Opinion

H. Hackfeld & Co. v. Coerper

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL I-’ROM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HONOLULU.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C.J.

The plaintiff brought an action in the district court of Honolulu upon the defendant’s promissory note, a statement of the demand, including a copy of the note, being set forth in the original writ signed by the magistrate and issued out of the district court and which, in the usual form, is brought in the name of the Territory, is directed “To the High Sheriff of the Territory of Hawaii or his deputy or Sheriff of the County of Oahu or his deputy or any police officer of the District of Honolulu, County of Oahu, Territory of Hawaii,” commanding them to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. McCoun v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Maile v. PrattHawaii Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoomana Naauao O Hawaii ex rel. Maia v. MakekauHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Richardson v. PaliHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API