Legal Opinion

Hoomana Naauao O Hawaii ex rel. Maia v. Makekau

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1920No. 1287Published

Appeal From District Magistrate op Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

This cause was instituted in the district court of Honolulu by the plaintiffs against the defendants and the garnishees. The copies of summons served on the defendants Nicholas and George were defective in that they did not contain the day of the month upon which the summons was issued nor the name of the magistrate or his clerk. The concluding paragraph of these copies reads as follows: “Given under my hand this day of May, 1920. Clerk District Court of Honolulu, City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii,” while the original reads: “Given under my…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Hoitt v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API