Legal Opinion

People v. Pena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733; People v Moore, 71 NY2d 1002, 1005-1006; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, 355, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). Because defendant pleaded guilty before Supreme Court determined his motion to suppress, defendant forfeited his right to our review of the contentions raised in that motion (see, People v Dunn, 218 AD2d 814; People v Patterson, 194 AD2d 748, 749, Iv denied 82 NY2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API