Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Harley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1905No. 13,909Published

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish,'Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, C.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse a judgment of the district court for Lancaster county. The defendant in error, hereafter styled the plaintiff, sued the plaintiffs in *463error, hereafter styled the defendants, on account of a personal injury which he claims he sustained by reason of certain negligent acts of the defendants; the allegations of his petition material to the inquiry being: “On or about the 27th day of August, 1902, the said defendant railway company and the said defendant John Kreps, its foreman, negligently and carelessly placed the said handcar, with shovels and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. TrowbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sherman, Shreveport & Southern Railway Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API