Legal Opinion
Fulani v. Brady
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 2, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-2649PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
In this case, Dr. Lenora B. Fulani claims that the Commission on Presidential Debates’ failure to invite her to participate in the 1988 presidential debates was partisan and therefore invalidates its status as a tax-exempt organization under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. This matter is now before the Court pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on the ground that Plaintiffs lack standing.
I. FACTS
In February 1987 the Intervenor, Commission on Presidential Debates (“CPD”), was founded by the Chairmen of the Democratic and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fulani v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Johnson v. Commission on Presidential DebatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Alabama v. BowsherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Fulani v. BentsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Fulani v. BradyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.