Legal Opinion
State v. Duke
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 10, 1993No. 725-92, 726-92PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WHITE, Judge.
The State charged appellees with engaging in organized criminal activity pursuant to V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 71.02(a)(3). Both sought to have the indictments quashed because they did not allege an overt act committed in furtherance of the combination and did not name the other members of the combination. The trial court granted each motion and the State appealed pursuant to Article 44.01(a)(1), Y.A.C.C.P. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Duke, No. 2-91-139-CR (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, delivered April 1, 1992) (opinion on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Fee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Abbett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Chambless v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1988
- McCall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- O'Brien v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Crum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Gemoets v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- McLaren v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.