Legal Opinion

Fee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1992No. 107-87PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 71.02. Punishment was assessed at fifty years confinement in the penitentiary. The Fourth Court of Appeals reformed the judgment to reflect that the sentence was enhanced, and affirmed the conviction. Fee v. State, 722 S.W.2d 234 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1986).

I

The indictment in this cause alleged that appellant and six others “did ... conspire to commit and agree to commit and did commit Theft over $20,000.00,” and that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Marras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Pesina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  5. Crum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API