Jackson v. Culinary School of Washington
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................717
II. DISCUSSION ............................................................719
A. Because the Defendants have established the absence of any specific facts tending to show the existence of an agency relationship between the Department of Education and the Culinary School here involved, the Plaintiffs may not recover on the basis of such a relationship.........................................................719
B. Because the Defendants have shown the absence of any evidence that the lenders delegated any…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael Jackson v. Culinary School of Washington, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Armstrong v. Accrediting Council for Continuing Education & TrainIng, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Lane Construction Corp. v. Trading Merchandising Co.Stafford County Circuit Court · 1994
- Hernandez v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
- Johnson, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021