Legal Opinion

Tallmadge v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1987No. B018804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants after the court granted their motion for summary judgment. We reverse as to defendant County of Los Angeles.

Walter Tallmadge was arrested for the unlawful possession of firearms and the firearms were seized. He was subsequently convicted of unlawful possession of machine guns. He was not convicted of unlawful possession of the remaining firearms. However, both the machine guns and the other guns were destroyed pursuant to court order.

Tallmadge and Charles Weedman, co-owners of the guns, allege the other guns were destroyed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Franklin v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Lick v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Kane v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ogborn v. City of LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Bonner v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Cappuccio, Inc. v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Rondon v. Mendocino County CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Tallmadge v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API