Legal Opinion

Kinzer v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — Hon. W.- G. Olem- • ents, Judge. Garnishment proceedings to subject the purchase price of a homestead owned by George W. Stephens and Hannah Stephens, his wife, now deceased, to the payment of a judgment obtained by one Kinzer against William W. Stephens, a son of George W. and Hannah Stephens. The trial court held the garnishees liable, and they appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

'The case involves a construction of section 2985 of the Code, which reads as follows: “Upon the death of either husband or wife the survivor may continue to possess and occupy the whole homestead until it is otherwise disposed of according to law * * * but if there be no survivor, the homestead descends to the issue of either husband or wife according to the rules of descent, * * * and it is to be held by such issue exempt from any antecedent debts of their parents or their own, except those of the owner thereof contracted prior to the acquisition.” Under this section we have held that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Burns v. KeasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Blum v. LightTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Johnson v. GaylordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Kaiser v. SeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In Re Estate of TolsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. Union County Investment Co. v. MessixSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Oskaloosa National Bank v. JamisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Tolson v. Clinton National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API