Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 14, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Criminal Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

Appellant, Alice Boyd, was indicted by virtue of that part of section 2573, Kentucky Statutes, which makes it a felony to write, print, sell, vend, barter, exchange, dispose of, furnish, supply, procure and canse to he supplied, etc., lottery tickets or gift enterprise wherein money or other things of value were disposed of or pretended to he disposed of. She was convicted on a trial and given the lowest penalty, two years in the penitentiary and a $500 fine.

Appellant asks a reversal for three reasons: First, *248because there was not sufficient evidence…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Tartar v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Hall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API