Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Alloys Corp. v. Considar Metal Marketing, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 30, 2009No. Case 06-12667PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
By opinion and order dated September 25, 2007, 2007 WL 2874005, the Court granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss brought by Defendant Considar Metal Marketing, Inc. In the wake of this ruling, Plaintiff Metropolitan Alloys Corporation filed a first amended complaint on November 27, 2007, asserting state-law claims of fraud, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel. Each of these claims arises from Defendant’s failure to perform in accordance with an alleged oral…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Xechem, Inc., and Xechem International, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Gary Arnett v. Gary T. Myers, Executive Director of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- P.A.L. Environmental Safety Corp. v. North American Dismantling Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Weinstein v. Meritor, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020