Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cornell-Young Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The defendant disclaimed any responsibility of any kind, for Scott’s injury, and, therefore, denied any obligation for his treatment, except for first aid, which the defendant had paid. The defendant contends that no one was authorized to contract this bill on its behalf, and therefore denies liability for same.

At the close of the evidence of the plaintiffs, the defendant moved for nonsuit, and, on the denial of the motion, asked the court to charge the jury to answer the issue in favor of the defendant, contending the facts are undisputed, and insisted that the whole question was one of law.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams & Reid v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Sanatorium v. . Yadkin River Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spicer v. . WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Richie Company v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Saliba v. Norfolk-Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API