Legal Opinion

Archdiocese of Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 6, 2020No. 18-1455Relating-toCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Statement of Justice GORSUCH, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, respecting the denial of certiorari.

*1199 Because the full Court is unable to hear this case, it makes a poor candidate for our review. But for that complication, however, our intervention and a reversal would be warranted for reasons admirably explained by Judge Griffith in his dissent below and by Judge Hardiman in an opinion for the Third Circuit. See 910 F.3d 1248 , 1250-1254 (C.A.D.C. 2018) (Griffith,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Good News Club v. Milford Central SchoolSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Northeastern Pennsylvania v. County of Lackawanna TransitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. & Paul J. WiedefeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young Israel of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  2. Young Israel of Tampa Inc v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API