Legal Opinion
Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. & Paul J. Wiedefeld
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 21, 2018No. 17-7171PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
A statement by Circuit Judge Griffith, with whom Circuit Judge Katsas joins, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
2DissentGriffith, Circuit Judge, joined by Circuit Judge Katsas
We ought to rehear this case en banc because the panel opinion conflicts with Supreme Court precedent on an issue of exceptional importance: the…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Good News Club v. Milford Central SchoolSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. ComerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Northeastern Pennsylvania v. County of Lackawanna TransitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Archdiocese of Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Shurtleff v. City of Bos.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Shurtleff v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019